Wednesday round-up: OTS, Olympics, Obama

In a radical break with tradition, here’s a Wednesday round-up for you of relevant news, views and opinion.

– First up, I’ve tried to capture a fair bit of Skoll, and post-Skoll coverage: that would be a links page on its own, though, so best viewed and checked out via our Del.icio.us bookmarks link at http://del.icio.us/SSE/Skoll which encompasses a pretty decent cross-section….

– A social enterprise business park as an Olympic legacy: sounds good. And most interestingly, put forward by someone who is a practitioner, not an umbrella org looking for funds; and we used Calverts for our last big printing job (highly recommended)

When Muhammad met Liam (Yunus and Black): interesting conversation transcript

– A compare and contrast on social franchising (US- based) from Social Enterprise Reporter

CSR as a business strategy

– Decent piece on (social) entrepreneurship / government policy in HBR; incidentally, there is a piece in the current Stanford Social Innovation Review which suggests what the new US president (come on Obama!) should do in this field. More on this soon…

– Also in SSIR is a piece about the relationship between producitivity and impact in the non-profit sector; it’s called "More Bang for the Buck" which gives you an indication of where it’s coming from. I think I took more from this case study

– Big welcome to the first 4 UK Ashoka Fellows, and congrats to Ben Metz for pulling off a good event the other evening. The Fellows are Camila Batmanghelidjh, Al Harris, Bob Paterson, and Faisel Rahman.

– OTS has released a piece of research from Rocket Science on Social Enterprise Networks. I found this useful and informative, but I’m not sure if that’s only because I’m approaching sector-geek status. What the report does do, alongside give a good overview of regional and sub-regional networks, is emphasise the need for more peer-to-peer learning / networks….and wisely pulls out SSE as a case study. :0)

More soon, when the frenzy of the last few weeks calms itself…..do buy some extra reading in the meantime :0)

Share Button

Blair to be Third Sector envoy

Third Sector have reported that Tony Blair is to take on a more troublesome and problematic conflict than the Middle East: that between ACEVO, NCVO and DSC. Acting primarily as an intermediary between disputing factions, Blair will use his substantial experience…

…oh, ok, April Fool etc. Good effort from Third Sector, though. Up till "I feel the hand of Stuart Etherington on my shoulder", they almost had me… :0)

Share Button

Is your website mainstream?

Noted today how the School of Everything (who live upstairs from us) blogged about how they hoped to see more people browsing on their website using Internet Explorer rather than Firefox, on the basis that this would demonstrate they are going ‘mainstream’. They then compare this to the Wikipedia breakdown of the average percentages of browser use.

This seems to me an eminently successful exercise, and a useful ‘finger-in-the-air’ assessment for whether you are just reaching white 30 year-old men who like reading Clay Shirky, watching TED video podcasts and twittering or friendfeeding every waking moment. You know who you are (he said, looking in the mirror). Wonder what the breakdown would be for all web 2.0 sites?

Not really applicable in SSE’s case, as we’re hardly web 2.0 (this blog aside), but happy to report that Google’s Analytics tells me we’re pretty much bang on the Wikipedia average: 71% Explorer, 22% Firefox, 6% Safari, a bit of Opera (so to speak) and then the odds and sods. Must attract more geeks to the site…. :0)

Share Button

Skoll Forum (part 2…)

Back and reporting after an exhausting final plenary session here at Skoll.

First to wrap up yesterday’s proceedings. I attended one of the ‘consultancy clinics‘: with a panel made up of Liam Black, Alex Nicholls (Skoll Centre, leading researcher), Jim Fruchterman  (Benetech) and Kevin Jones (GoodCap), I had high hopes. But the session never really took off: whether this was due to the ‘pitching’ projects (when a pitch ends after 5 minutes, and the panel ask what you do, it’s never a good sign…) or the format, I’m not really sure, but the fireworks never really happened. With the possible exception of the final project, the Big Give, whose business model (or lack of therein) got a bit of a savaging, before the panellists got a bit more constructive in their critique.

In the evening, the Skoll Awards were given out. Jimmy Carter was, by all accounts, very inspirational and the award-winners are a pretty amazing bunch of people, doing pretty extraordinary things. I must confess that I watched it this morning on video as well, having chosen instead to spend the afternoon with noted UK troublemakers (Black, Wilson, Kershaw) and others in a local hostelry. A good time had by all, as you can see from the photo below; an image I’ve found hard to dislodge:

Nigel_2

Later, I went to the Social Edge (where you can see lots of blog and video footage of the Forum) dinner: thanks to Jill and Victor for the invite, and I’m looking forward to working with them in connecting the UK bloggers and podcasters into their great space for discussion and connection. Met some great people (again) from great organisations, like Tal from MBAsWithoutBorders, Mike and Omar from Berkeley, and Matt Flannery of Kiva, who was notably humble and unassuming, not to mention interesting company.

After reuniting with a dissolute UK bunch in a local Chinese restaurant, I headed home…..

—————————-

DAY 3: I have to go and catch the train back to London to get to the Ashoka awards event on time, so I will blog about this soon. Suffice to say that whereas by the end of Day 2 I was in full, cynical curmudgeon mode, I leave inspired. The storytelling session this morning was worth coming to the whole forum, with Walter Mosley and James Orbinski…in fact, the whole panel were simply outstanding, and I have countless pages of notes on the risks of heroisation (obviously discussed recently on this blog), the need for relevant role models, the balance between truth and propaganda, perspective and resolution, the risks of empowerment, the role of humour and much more besides. Probably the best session I have been to in five years of coming to this event.

After that, the final plenary was going to struggle, but Paul Farmer (Partners in Health) almost did. He was fabulous and finally, on the Skoll stage, communicated the need for social entrepreneurship to include the disadvantaged, excluded and poorest to "allow them to be social entrepreneurs" rather than viewing them as beneficiaries, problems to solve, or markets to exploit. Amen and hallelujah to him, his work and his words. And he was so good that Al Gore, who followed, left less of an impression: indeed, he was moved to say to Paul Farmer, "I am not worthy".

I would really recommend going to Social Edge (link above), and watching the videos of those two sessions; worth making time for.

Share Button

Skoll Forum (part 1…)

First missive from here at the Skoll Forum; just thought I’d give a run down on yesterday afternoon’s opening proceedings.

Opening ceremony was in the Sheldonian Theatre, which is beautiful and old…but also pretty uncomfortable after a couple of hours. Nevertheless, pretty impressive surroundings to kick off in.

First up, after Stephan Chambers (Chair, Skoll Centre) welcomed us in his engaging, wry manner, Jeff Skoll spoke, and was very entertaining, noting that Al Gore and Muhammad Yunus both won the Nobel Prize after they had been keynote speaker at the Forum ("coincidence? I don’t think so…"). His theme was that this movement was now entering the mainstream: a case of "here we are" rather than "here we come" (he backed this up with examples from Bill Gates, Barack Obama and Oprah Winfrey: an alternative trinity to conjur with).

Next up was Lord Giddens who had an engaging style, no notes…and some half decent jokes. With the theme being "culture", though, it seemed strange to have him talk on climate change…it also felt a bit like a beginner’s guide to climate change. With a room of people who know those issues inside out, this seemed strange….and it kind of felt like he’d been booked for his speaking credentials, rather than his relevance to social entrepreneurship (occasionally, he’d seem to remember and say something like "…which is..er.. why we need you, the social entrepreneurs"). His three key issues, for the record, that we need to tackle are: freeriding, hyperbolic discounting (not taking the future seriously), and "spending" the energy we save.

Phil Hope, the Minister for the Third Sector was next, and gave a pretty rousing speech. It was nicely structured, using Beveridge / welfare state / "stalking giants" as a frame for what is needed, and what has changed, 60 years on. He talked encouragingly of the need to "mobilise social entrepreneurs" who have a "vital and catalytic role", and also of the need to work with an engaged government, rather than ignoring the state altogether. With 700 people from 40 different countries, it did feel a bit domestically-focused (people near me were glazing over at the mention of social clauses, and other elements of government activity; as well as asking me who Harold Wilson was…).

The example he used of a social entrepreneur creating an opportunity and movement seized by government also seemed strange: the anti-plastic bag movement started in a town in Devon, then picked up in the media, then rolled out by government. The Irish government didn’t need the Daily Mail et al to pick the issue up to ban them 5 years ago, and was government taken by the idea…or by the media coverage?….Overall, though, I was fairly impressed, and he had some nice lines ("real change cannot be financed by small change") and powerful delivery.

The final part was a panel of women who’d worked in cross-cultural projects and initiatives. The one who stood out for me was Jody Williams, who I confess to never having heard of before. She won the Nobel Peace Prize for pulling off the treaty banning landines in 95 countries, and was just outstanding: on respect and trust for partners, on communication and sharing of information, on not worrying who gets the credit: "nobody was more important than anybody else". Really inspired by her, particularly given our international initiatives.

Finally, Stephan Chambers wrapped up, reminding us of the forum theme of culture: shared experience, behaviour, habits… and that "behaviour isn’t geology" (i.e. it keeps changing). But he was brief because, as he pointed out, "I’m the only thing standing between you feeling your legs again and getting a drink". Nice touch.

 

Then we all packed off to Trinity College for drinks in a marquee (the heavens opened as we left the theatre, ensuring that I networked heavily with people with umbrellas); all good stuff, and met some interesting people from Israel, Latvia, Russia, China, as well as some more familiar faces from the UK and Ireland. Dinner followed on with the Social Entrepreneurs Ireland team, Nigel Kershaw, Yasmin from Lovells et al….

All of which made getting up to deliver our presentation at 8am a little challenging. But it went well, and have just missed the first scheduled session because of the continuing conversations afterwards (which I think is a good sign: all the good stuff happens off the programme!)….but will try and get back on track with one of the new ‘consultancy clinics’ (dreadful name, but good people by the look of it) this afternoon.

Over and out.

Share Button