Schwab Award (UK): Belu Water wins

SSE attended the Schwab Social Entrepreneur of the Year award at the British Museum   Monday night to hear Reed Paget of Belu Water be crowned winner of that title for the first time in the UK. The Independent, the competition’s media partner, reports it in this article. It was a slightly curious event, with a relatively small audience (50 or so?) in a very rarefied setting; Pamela Hartigan, who is the driving force behind Schwab, couldn’t make it because she was ill, and I think she was missed as someone to provide a uniting thread for the event.

Nevertheless, if social entrepreneurship had glitterati, they were out in force: chief execs of UnLtd, Ashoka, CAN, Training for Life, Big Invest, Big Issue, Eden Project, The Hub, and so forth. Most interesting conversation for me was to find out about one of the nominees, Matt Scott from Cosmos Ignite Innovations. Check out the website; it’s a great innovation.

Share Button

The importance of a citizen base

In my second full week with the SSE I’ve become increasingly aware of the many SSE Fellows who are out there, still keeping their projects sustainable and still causing positive change. On the tube this morning I was reading the Global Ideas Bank’s  "500 Ways to Change the World" and it really occurred to me how many different people have original solutions to various problems. While the book was edited and compiled by Nick Temple (Network Director at SSE) , the content was created by people who have recognized a fault  in  society and  have an idea  to fix it : ‘ordinary’ people suggesting social innovations.

The fact that so many want to help, and have such ideas, bodes well not only for the future of the SSE model, but also similar projects such as Ashoka’s much welcomed CBI Initiative. While not in Britain quite yet, (although on the way: it’s made it to France ) the Citizen Base Initiative seeks to alter "old funding strategies" and aims at helping citizen sector organisations to think differently about utilising resources, revenue streams etc, so that they can become more self-sufficient/more vibrant/less dependent on erratic funding. CBI tries to help the citizen sector break from traditional funding bodies and the state.

In essence, It’s about a wider view of stakeholders and how they (your organisation’s citizen base) can help access different types of resources, and help provide support. Very much in line with the view that social entrepreneurs create change through building networks, teams and movements, rather than as heroic individuals (see previous post on this subject)

Share Button

Funding, the arts, and balance.

Leafing through the weekend papers, there’s a lot of reporting going on of the Arts Council cuts in funding, and how they are affecting arts organisations in different ways. Admittedly, the bleeding-heart liberal, left-leaning, cappuccino–supping papers I read are arguably more likely to cover theatre types getting angry, but coverage on the whole shebang, on legal threats, on literature translation, and much more seems quite a lot over the course of two or three days. Where was the media when the Community Champions fund, one of the few providing grassroots support to individual community activists, was ditched? [the CC fund provided up to £2000 to over 10,000 people and had a pretty impressive record of outcomes and impact too].

The message also seems confused: one article lambasted the amount spent on opera, whilst another pointed out how a regional opera company was having its funding cut as an example of a poor decision. Ultimately, you have to feel some sympathy with the funders: their overall funding is increasingly constricted (falling lottery sales + Olympics), and there are often no "right" answers in these cases. Whilst calls for ‘arts’ people to run these funds have some validity, the nuts and bolts of effective grant-giving is as much about measurement, monitoring and administration as about informed decision-making.

Clearly, the process could have gone better (pre-Xmas with little response time) and could, possibly, have been more transparent. But the coverage has seemed quite unbalanced. This article, for example, with the calming title of "the final reckoning", details 6 arts organisations facing cuts. All worthy ca(u)ses, particularly the two theatres, it would seem to me. But none facing extinction, and some facing a reduction of around a fifth or sixth of their annual budget: substantial, but how many third sector organisations enter a financial year with all their funding and budget secured? Indeed, the experiences of these arts organisations will chime with many in the third sector….though the amount of coverage / campaigning in the media is markedly different. And where is the coverage of the organisations (700+) receiving an increase in funding from March, and the details of what greater impact they can now have?

From an SSE point of view, it’s clear that this could affect students and Fellows who work in the arts sphere, of whom there are quite a few. On the other hand, several current students in London, and (shortly) in Liverpool and East Midlands have places funded by a programme which is supported (amongst others) by the Arts Council. Crucial support at a key stage of their journey in changing people’s lives through the arts.

Swings, as they say, and roundabouts: and no black and white answers.

Share Button

Is Social Enterprise applicable in academic institutions?

After my first full week with the SSE and in the
UK, I think I am starting to grasp the basics of both. It took me a while to
get used to the light switch, the traffic system and the British slang, but
it’s amazing how quickly one adapts to a new environment. In my first week here
at the office I’ve been trying to get a sense of the SE sector by poking around
on the web and working on different projects for the network team. At first I
was a bit overwhelmed by all the different companies, names, terms and slang,
but it’s starting to sink in gradually .

One of the things I’ve been working on is the Social Enterprise
Ambassadors programme

, led by SEC and assisted by a
consortium of different organisations, including of course, SSE. It’s been
very interesting to read about the very inspiring  individuals that make
up the ambassadors group and I very much look forward to meeting them at a
training session towards the end of my stay in London.

Although the SE Ambassadors are amazing people, and have been chosen to promote the
movement, what’s been inspiring  to me so far is my
encounters and interaction with the students and  Fellows
of SSE. While social change was an abstract term to me at school, my meetings
with these people have shown me that change doesn’t occur in the abstract or (necessarily) on
the macro level, it happens in our local communities, mostly at a smaller scale.
My challenge in the months to come is to figure out a way to bridge such
practical solutions with an abstract learning model that will work for my college back in Minnesota. SSE programmes are very much about learning, rather
than teaching…and focused on the practical and personal, rather than the
academic and generic.

Since I’ve also learned that much of the conversation
about  social  change indeed occurs through blogging I
would love any input /responses to this question:

How can Social Enterprise/Innovation/Entrepreneurship be taught in an academic setting?

 

Share Button

Social entrepreneur round-up: BBBC, Fast Company, Independent

A few things of direct relevance to the blog have cropped up over the last few days that might be of interest.

– First up, Andrew Mawson, founder of the Bromley By Bow Centre, has written a book (The Social Entrepreneur) which was excerpted in the Guardian this morning, and commented on in their blog; his forthright comments about the failings of politicians and what he would do instead (give £3m to Alan Sugar, for example) make interesting reading….

– Secondly, Fast Company, the US business magazine have announced their 2008 Social Capitalist Awards….which involves them adding some new ones to ones they’ve announced previously…45 social entrepreneurs and enterprises now. Worth checking out.

– Finally, the Independent has been working with Schwab and Boston Consulting Group on their Social Entrepreneur of the Year award (which the Schwab foundation do in many other countries around the world). The shortlist is announced here and replicated here on this blog, where I also responded to the post in the comments (about whether it is needed / how well the UK is served etc.) Some well-known names here: Eden, Belu, the Hub, but good to see some less well known ones also, especially Eric Samuels at Community Food Enterprise. I know that Schwab has canvassed widely in the UK amongst its networks (including with SSE), so will be interesting to read/hear more about it. The SSE blog will be attending the awards event next week, so will report back then.

Share Button